So basically, any peer reviewed data that is based on any self reporting isn’t factual, and should not be considered, and anecdotal experience should be considered above that.

Here’s the problem. More than one person at this point has read this article and refused to believe the data that was based on sample sizes of thousands of people. Yet, they want their thoughts on the matter, which is based on nothing but their feelings to be considered more important and valid, then research.

Also, saying that everything that I’ve said is untrue, also invalidates an experience that I’ve been through at least twice and can substantiate.